Ensure that threads never open and close lock-files directly. In the API, implement a process-wide singleton shared by all threads holding all currently acquired locks. The program starts two threads or processes, both of which wait to acquire the lock, then sleep for one second, and then release the lock. It has three parameters:. You can try to run these two snippets in parallel in different terminals and see that while one is sleeping while holding the lock, another is blocked in flock.
Runs the given command while holding a lock. Lists all the currently held file locks in the entire system. Allows to perform filtering by PID and to configure the output format. A file in procfs virtual file system that shows current file locks of all types. The lslocks tools relies on this file. Linux has limited support for mandatory file locking. Note that the set-group-ID bit has its regular meaning of elevating privileges when the group-execute bit is on and a special meaning of enabling mandatory locking when the group-execute bit is off.
When an exclusive or shared lock is acquired, all system calls that modify the file e. When an exclusive lock is acquired, all system calls that read from the file e. Linux supports two major kinds of file locks: advisory locks mandatory locks Below we discuss all lock types available in POSIX and Linux and provide usage examples.
Advisory locking Traditionally, locks are advisory in Unix. There are several types of advisory locks available in Linux: BSD locks flock POSIX record locks fcntl, lockf Open file description locks fcntl All locks except the lockf function are reader-writer locks , i. Locks are allowed only on files, but not directories.
Locks are automatically removed when the process exits or terminates. Differing features This table summarizes the difference between the lock types. BSD locks flock The simplest and most common file locks are provided by flock 2. Features: not specified in POSIX, but widely available on various Unix systems always lock the entire file associated with a file object do not guarantee atomic switch between the locking modes exclusive and shared up to Linux 2.
From the man page: Converting a lock shared to exclusive, or vice versa is not guaranteed to be atomic: the existing lock is first removed, and then a new lock is established. Features: specified in POSIX base standard can be applied to a byte range associated with an [i-node, pid] pair instead of a file object guarantee atomic switch between the locking modes exclusive and shared work on NFS on Linux The lock acquisition is associated with an [i-node, pid] pair, i.
All threads belonging to the same process always share the lock acquisition of a file, which means that: the lock acquired through some file descriptor by some thread may be released through another file descriptor by another thread; when any thread calls close on any descriptor referring to given file, the lock is released for the whole process, even if there are other opened descriptors referring to this file. There are numerous uses for file locking. However, looking at database file access gives an excellent example of the types of locks that applications require.
For example, it is important that all users wishing to view database records are able to do so simultaneously. When updating records it is imperative that while one record is being updated, other users are still able to access other records. Finally it is imperative that records are updated in a time-ordered manner. There are two types of locks that can be used to coordinate access to files, namely mandatory and advisory locks. Lockfile is clock skew immune. After a lockfile has been removed by force, a suspension of suspend seconds defaults to 16 is taken into account, in order to prevent the inadvertent immediate removal of any newly created lockfile by another program compare SUSPEND in procmail 1.
Mailbox locks If the permissions on the system mail spool directory allow it, or if lockfile is suitably setgid, it will be able to lock and unlock your system mailbox by using the options -ml and -mu respectively. In this case you could solve it like this Use shorter filenames. Forced unlock denied on "x" No write permission in the directory where lockfile "x" resides, or more than one lockfile trying to force a lock at exactly the same time.
Out of memory, The system is out of swap space. Signal received,
0コメント